Investment

Less than one hour of outside counsel per week.

A single D&O defense costs $150,000 to $1,000,000 or more. decision.forum Board tier costs $24,000 per year — less than 16 hours of outside counsel at standard billing rates.

Counsel

$6,000/year

$500 per month

For individual executives, independent directors, and advisory professionals who need forensic-grade decision governance for their own practice.

3 seats

50 Decision Forum sessions per month

Full Decision Records with Adversarial Review

Minority Reports

Panel Confidence Index

Decision Archive (searchable history)

Standard AI model panel

Evidence Bundle export

Email support

Request Demo
Recommended

Board

$24,000/year

$2,000 per month

For operating boards and C-suite governance teams that need institutional-grade decision governance across their full deliberation calendar.

15 seats with role-based access (Chair, Director, Counsel, Observer)

250 Decision Forum sessions per month

Premium AI model panel (all frontier models)

Board Brief Generator

Minority Reports + Panel Confidence Index analytics

Evidence Bundle export

BYOK option (bring your own API keys)

API access for GRC integration

Priority support

Request Demo

Enterprise

Custom

$36,000–$96,000+ per year

For public companies, regulated industries, private equity portfolios, and multi-entity governance structures.

Unlimited seats and sessions

SSO / SAML authentication

Custom model configuration

Dedicated EXOCHAIN environment

SLA with uptime guarantees

Audit export to GRC systems (Diligent, OnBoard, etc.)

White-glove onboarding and training

Dedicated support with named account contact

Contact Us

Category of one. No free tier. This is not a chatbot.

Included in every tier.

These are not optional add-ons. Every Decision Forum session, at every tier, is built on the same constitutional infrastructure.

Cryptographically signed Decision Records

EXOCHAIN immutable ledger recording

bailment.ai legal contract wrapping

0dentity cryptographic verification

FRE 901/803(6)/902(13/14) architectural alignment

AI-IRB governed session methodology

Self-verifying Evidence Bundle export

Adversarial Review on every session

Minority Reports preserved permanently

Panel Confidence Index measurement

Cost Context

Put the investment in perspective.

Average D&O defense cost (private company)

$150,000 – $1,000,000+

Average securities class action settlement

$10,000,000+

Outside counsel rate (standard)

$500 – $1,500/hour

Annual cost: 16 hours of outside counsel

$8,000 – $24,000

decision.forum Board tier

$24,000/year

Cost per Decision Forum session (Board tier, full usage)

$8.00

“A single D&O defense costs $150,000 to $1,000,000 or more. A shareholder derivative suit costs millions. decision.forum costs less than preventing one.”

Questions boards ask before subscribing.

This is expensive. Justify it.

A single D&O defense engagement typically costs $150,000 to $1,000,000 or more before reaching the merits. The Board tier costs $24,000 per year. The investment is not in the tool — it is in the evidence trail that determines whether a decision is defended successfully or settled under duress.

We already have a board portal. Why do we need this?

Board portals manage logistics — agendas, documents, votes. decision.forum governs the quality of the decision itself. It does not replace Diligent or OnBoard. It provides the decision intelligence layer they do not have: multi-model deliberation, adversarial stress-testing, and a forensic-grade audit trail.

Could the AI-generated records be used against us in discovery?

Decision Records are designed for discoverability. That is the point. When a decision is challenged, you want the record to exist — because the alternative is no record at all, which is far more damaging under Caremark and its progeny. An Evidence Bundle showing informed deliberation is your defense, not your vulnerability.

How do we know the AI analysis is reliable?

Single-AI tools give you one perspective. decision.forum convenes an independent panel of leading AI models that deliberate, challenge each other, and must converge before reaching consensus. A built-in Adversarial Review actively tries to break the consensus. The result is not one AI's opinion — it is the surviving consensus after independent, multi-source stress-testing.

Can we trust that your system is secure?

EXOCHAIN is open-source, externally audited, and architecturally incapable of administrative override. PII/PHI never touches the ledger. Constitutional rules are enforced cryptographically — not by policy, but by mathematics. No override mechanism exists.

Start with a conversation about your governance challenge.